shane warne is a leg spin bowler for right handed bats man. lets imagine that rest of the players from other countries all are left handed batsman. so will he be still called as leg spinner?

lets say:..batsman played a ball straight down to the bowler and bowler touches the ball and hit the stumps and the non striker is out of his crease. Now at the time when the ball hit the non striker stumps ....the batsman was hit wicket. In clousion the timing of the ball hitting the non striker stumps and the striker being hit wicket is the same. So in this case..who will be out?

.
its hit-wicket out
takes precedence
even if, in this case, the stumps at the non-strikers end was broken before the batsman disturbed the stumps at his end, it would still be hit-wicket

as for the leg-spinner thing,
a rose by any other name would still smell as sweet

Your answer to the first question is Yes. Orthodoxically, leg spinners are wrist spinners unlike off spinners who are finger spinners, so it does not matter whether batsmen are right or left handed. But yes, they will take the deliveries as off-spin for a righ-handed batsmen.

Second question is a bit tricky as very rarely such situation arises. I wonder, if that has ever happened. When a batsman is out, the ball is dead by default so it cannot do additional damage to the batting side. However, if the timing is same, both can be given out and/or benefit of the doubt can be given to one.

Mr. lonely. what i mentioned the question it has never happend in the history of cricket and i think that it will never happen in the future too....its just a trivia!.....anyway..as far as rule says that both batsman cannot be out...so in urs view benefit of dought belongs to whom ...striker or non striker?....

.
the thing is,
the rule states that both batsmen cannot be out
the rule for runouts provides the provision that a batsman may not be declared run-out if the ball is dead
the rule for hit-wicket does not provide this

now,
if the non-striker is out run-out, the ball is dead, but since hit-wicket dont care for dead ball, the striker is also out, which is a contradiction
on the other case, if the striker is out hit wicket, the ball is dead and hence the runner cannot be out run-out, which satisfies the 'one batsman out' rule

thats why its hit wicket

Hit wicket
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hit wicket is a method of dismissal in the sport of cricket. This method of dismissal is governed by Law 35 of the Laws of cricket. The striker is out Hit-wicket if, after the bowler has entered his delivery stride and while the ball is in play, his wicket is put down by his bat or his person. The striker may do this whilst preparing to receive or receiving a delivery or in setting off for his first run after playing the delivery. In simple language if the striking batsman knocks the bails off the stumps or uproots the stumps, while attempting to hit the ball or take off for a run, he is out hit wicket.

This method is the sixth most common method of dismissal after caught, bowled, leg before wicket, run out and stumped.

Although a bowler is given credit for the wicket, it is not a method of dismissal that a bowler actively seeks and it is relatively uncommon. A batsman may not be given out Hit wicket if the ball is not actually delivered by the bowler or if the delivery is a no ball (ie a delivery that is not fair).

The second question made me think for a while. Two batsmen being "out" at the same instance ( i mean even if measured in milisecond) would leave the batsmen themselves to decide who is out, since I doubt there is a written rule to it (somebody please correct me here). In this case, if Sachin Tendulkar and Prasad were batting, I think it would be wise for Prasad to leave the wicket (though many would argue that Prasad is a better batsman than Tendulkar :). The third umpires would not be abe to decide who was out first because they both became out at the same time. Certainly, the opposition players can not drag Tendulkar by the scruff of his neck out of the ground?

As regards the first question, Shane Warne would be considered a legspinner in general. It is somewhat similar to following the conventional wisdom for the sake of simplicity, say for instance, the direction of travel of electrcity in diagrams where it is shown to travel from +ve to -ve (or is it the other way around?). Nevermind

Ok, here's another one. A bit easy.
While taking a run, the non-striker runs towards the striker's end but the striker doesn't move and stays in his crease. The non-striker has already reached the striker's end. And the fielder throws the ball towards the non-striker's end and gets the bails off.
Now who is run-out? Striker or non-striker?

Non-striker,
:-)

A LEFT HANDED LEG SPINNER ( FOR LEFT HANDED BATSMEN) IS A CHINAMEN BOWLER...LIKE PAUL ADAMS OF SOUTH AFRICA AND MICHAEL BEVAN OF AUSTRALIA

IS THAT RIGHT?

I think the striker gets out. The non-striker has already made to the other side but the striker did not get off his crease. I think but not sure Hurray.

IT IS THE NON-STRIKER WHO GETS OUT IF THE STRIKER DOES NOT LEAVE THE CREASE....100% SURE ABOUT THIS

One question: How many ways can a batsman get out in cricket? Name them.....

Cricket lovers, there's some work for you

I Think There are Ten way's Mysteryman

Bold,
Catch,
Lbw
Run Out,
Stumped
Hit The Ball Twice'
Hit wicket,
Handled The Ball
Obstructing The field
Time Out,

:-)

Hit the ball twice? That always happens doesn't it? Say, a batsman defends the ball, but the ball is now rolling towards the stumps, is he not allowed to stop the ball with his bat from running into the stumps? I think batsman around the world do that, don't they? I know they can stop by legs but I have seen batsman do that with their bat too.

Time Out? Do you mean if one batsman is out and the other one doesnot enter the field withing a certain time, is it a minute?

I think there is another one too. I heard them say there are 11 ways to be given out. I am not sure whats the other one. Retired Hurt could be one if the batsman doesn't choose to come back and resume his innings, could it?

Interesting!

I see cricket lovers here. The second one is bit tricky. I have seen the similar situation before, and as far as I remember the batsman at the non striker end was given run out.

How many chinamen are there? The only guy that I remember is paul Adams from South Africa. :) He had a peculiar bowling action.

We should talk more about cricket.:)

Michael bevan used bowl chinamen

The lefty, Michael Bevan. He as one of the best one day plaers who could do wonder ith the bat, ball and in the filed. Is he still around?

Hit the ball twice — When the batsman deliberately strikes the ball a second time, except for the sole purpose of guarding his wicket. No player is credited with the dismissal

Timed out — When a new batsman takes more than three minutes to take his position in the field to replace a dismissed batsman. (If the delay is even more protracted, the umpires may cause the match to be forfeited.) No player is credited with the dismissal

Additionally, a batsman may leave the field without being dismissed. For instance, if he is injured or taken ill, this is known as retired hurt or retired ill. The batsman is not out; he may return to bat later in the same innings if sufficiently recovered.

Khushi Lagyoooooooooooooooo!!

Kirket Fyan
:-),

How many chinamen are there?
Michael Bevan, Brad Hogg and Simon Katich,Dave Mohammed of west Indies and South African Paul Adams ,